Decentralized finance, commonly known as DeFi, was built on the idea of eliminating intermediaries and creating open financial systems powered by smart contracts. For years, this innovation existed largely outside traditional regulatory frameworks, operating in a gray area where existing financial rules struggled to apply. However, that era is rapidly coming to an end.
According to PwC, regulators around the world are now applying traditional market rules to DeFi, signaling a major shift in how decentralized financial systems are viewed and governed. Rather than treating DeFi as an experimental technology, regulators increasingly see it as a functional equivalent to traditional financial markets—one that should deliver similar standards of market integrity, transparency, consumer protection, and risk management.
This evolution reflects the growing scale and influence of DeFi. What started as a niche experiment has matured into a complex ecosystem facilitating lending, trading, derivatives exposure, and asset management for millions of users globally. As DeFi continues to mirror traditional financial activities, regulators are responding by aligning oversight expectations with familiar market principles.
This article explores why regulators are moving traditional market rules to DeFi, how this shift is unfolding in practice, and what it means for developers, investors, and users navigating the future of decentralized finance.
Why regulators are applying traditional market rules to DeFi
The primary reason regulators are applying traditional market rules to DeFi is scale. DeFi protocols now process billions of dollars in transactions, support sophisticated financial strategies, and attract both retail and institutional participants. As DeFi grows, the risks associated with market manipulation, operational failures, and consumer harm increase accordingly.
From a regulatory perspective, allowing a parallel financial system to operate without comparable safeguards creates uneven risk across markets. PwC highlights that regulators are no longer focused solely on whether DeFi is decentralized, but on whether it performs functions similar to regulated financial activities. If the economic reality resembles a trading venue, lending platform, or derivatives market, regulators expect comparable outcomes.
Another key driver is enforcement readiness. Many jurisdictions have moved beyond drafting crypto regulations and are now actively enforcing them. As enforcement accelerates, existing market conduct rules are being extended to DeFi-related activities, particularly where there are identifiable operators, governance structures, or service providers.
The global regulatory philosophy behind traditional market rules to DeFi
Regulators are not acting in isolation. A shared global philosophy underpins the move to apply traditional market rules to DeFi.
Same activity, same risk, same regulation
A core regulatory principle shaping DeFi oversight is “same activity, same risk, same regulation.” This approach emphasizes outcomes over technology. Instead of asking how a system is built, regulators focus on what it does and the risks it creates.
Under this framework, decentralized platforms that facilitate trading, lending, or asset management are evaluated against the same benchmarks as traditional financial institutions performing similar functions. This philosophy enables regulators to adapt existing rules rather than invent entirely new ones for DeFi.
Comparable regulatory outcomes for investor protection
Another major regulatory objective is achieving consistent investor protection across financial markets. PwC notes that regulators aim to ensure DeFi users receive protections comparable to those in traditional finance, including clear disclosures, fair dealing, and safeguards against abusive practices.
This does not necessarily mean identical rules, but it does mean comparable outcomes. The emphasis is on protecting users and maintaining confidence in financial markets, regardless of whether transactions occur on-chain or off-chain.
What applying traditional market rules to DeFi looks like in practice
Applying traditional market rules to DeFi does not mean regulating smart contracts line by line. Instead, regulators focus on core market principles and assess how they are achieved within decentralized ecosystems.
Market integrity and on-chain surveillance
In traditional finance, regulators closely monitor markets for manipulation, insider trading, and abusive behavior. When these expectations are applied to DeFi, attention turns to on-chain surveillance, transaction transparency, and data analytics.
Because blockchain transactions are public, DeFi offers unprecedented visibility into market activity. Regulators increasingly expect DeFi ecosystems to leverage this transparency to detect and mitigate manipulation, wash trading, and other harmful practices.
Governance and conflict-of-interest management
DeFi governance has become a major regulatory focus. Many protocols rely on governance tokens, multisignature wallets, or core development teams to manage upgrades and parameters. From a regulatory standpoint, these structures can create conflicts of interest similar to those seen in traditional financial institutions.
Applying traditional market rules to DeFi means greater scrutiny of how decisions are made, who has influence, and whether conflicts are disclosed and managed appropriately. Transparent governance processes and accountability mechanisms are becoming increasingly important.
Consumer protection and product oversight
Consumer protection is central to traditional market regulation, and this priority is now extending into DeFi. Regulators are paying closer attention to how DeFi products are marketed, whether risks are clearly explained, and how users are protected from misleading claims.
User interfaces, wallets, and aggregators often serve as the primary access points to DeFi. These layers are likely to face heightened expectations around disclosures, fair presentation of risks, and responsible product design.
The challenge of accountability in decentralized systems
One of the most complex aspects of applying traditional market rules to DeFi is determining who is responsible.
Identifying responsible persons
Regulators generally seek accountable parties who exercise meaningful influence over financial activities. In DeFi, this may include developers with control over upgrades, governance participants with concentrated voting power, or entities operating front-end interfaces.
Even when protocols claim decentralization, regulators may assess whether practical control exists and whether certain actors can reasonably be expected to meet compliance obligations.
Front ends and service layers as regulatory focal points
While smart contracts may be immutable, many DeFi users interact through centralized interfaces. These front ends can be regulated more easily than protocol code, making them natural targets for enforcement of traditional market rules.
As a result, regulation may focus on how DeFi is packaged and delivered rather than on the underlying blockchain logic.
Regional frameworks accelerating traditional market rules to DeFi
Regulatory convergence is also being driven by regional crypto frameworks that indirectly shape DeFi access.
Europe’s role in shaping expectations
European crypto regulation emphasizes transparency, consumer protection, and market integrity. Even when DeFi protocols themselves fall outside direct regulation, service providers that interact with them are increasingly subject to licensing and conduct requirements.
This indirect regulation influences how DeFi products are offered and accessed, effectively extending traditional market expectations into decentralized environments.
Global standard setters reinforcing alignment
International coordination among regulators has accelerated the normalization of applying traditional market rules to DeFi. As jurisdictions adopt similar principles, regulatory arbitrage becomes less viable, and consistent expectations emerge across borders.
Compliance themes defining the future of DeFi regulation
Several recurring compliance themes are shaping how traditional market rules are applied to DeFi.
Financial crime and AML controls
Preventing illicit finance remains a top priority for regulators. DeFi platforms connected to fiat gateways or regulated entities are increasingly expected to implement risk-based controls, transaction monitoring, and sanctions screening at appropriate points.
Operational resilience and smart contract risk
Traditional financial markets require robust operational resilience. In DeFi, this translates into strong smart contract security, regular audits, incident response planning, and transparent communication during disruptions or exploits.
Enhanced disclosures and transparency
Regulators expect disclosures that go beyond publishing code. Users must be able to understand risks, fees, governance structures, and potential conflicts in clear, accessible language. This aligns DeFi more closely with traditional financial disclosure standards.
What this shift means for DeFi builders
For builders, applying traditional market rules to DeFi changes the definition of success. Technical innovation alone is no longer sufficient. Protocols must also consider governance design, transparency, and regulatory resilience.
Rather than stifling innovation, this shift may encourage more sustainable growth. Projects that proactively align with regulatory expectations are likely to gain trust from users, partners, and institutional participants.
What it means for users and investors
For users, increased regulatory oversight can improve safety, clarity, and confidence. Clearer disclosures and stronger protections reduce the likelihood of unexpected losses caused by hidden risks or misleading information.
For investors, regulatory convergence may reduce uncertainty and attract more institutional capital. While some high-risk opportunities may diminish, the overall ecosystem could become more stable and resilient.
Conclusion
PwC’s analysis makes one thing clear: regulators are applying traditional market rules to DeFi, and this trend is accelerating. DeFi is no longer viewed solely as an experimental alternative—it is increasingly treated as part of the global financial system.
This shift brings challenges, particularly around governance and accountability, but it also offers opportunities. By embracing transparency, strengthening governance, and focusing on user protection, DeFi can mature without losing its core principles.
The future of decentralized finance will be shaped not by whether regulation arrives, but by how effectively innovation and regulation evolve together.
FAQs
Q: Why are traditional market rules being applied to DeFi?
Because DeFi now performs functions similar to traditional financial markets and poses comparable risks, regulators want consistent standards for integrity and consumer protection.
Q: Does this mean DeFi will lose its decentralization?
Not necessarily. Regulation often focuses on access points and governance rather than banning decentralized protocols outright.
Q: Who is responsible in a decentralized protocol?
Responsibility may fall on developers, governance participants, or interface operators who exercise meaningful control or influence.
Q: How will this affect DeFi users?
Users may benefit from clearer disclosures, stronger protections, and reduced exposure to fraudulent or misleading products.
Q: Can DeFi still innovate under traditional market rules?
Yes. Many innovations can coexist with regulatory expectations, especially when protocols design governance and transparency into their systems from the start.
Also Read: Ethereum DeFi TVL Hits $99B Milestone
